STATUS OF THE EASTERN PIPISTRELLE (PIPISTRELLUS SUBFLAVUS) (CHIROPTERA: VESPERTILIONIDAE) IN NEW BRUNSWICK

2001 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 331-336 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugh G. Broders ◽  
Donald F. McAlpine ◽  
Graham J. Forbes
2001 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 331
Author(s):  
Hugh G. Broders ◽  
Donald F. McAlpine ◽  
Graham J. Forbes

1996 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. 431-441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane M. Winchell ◽  
Thomas H. Kunz

Daily and seasonal activity budgets of adult female eastern pipistrelle bats, Pipistrellus subflavus, were quantified at a maternity colony in eastern Massachusetts. Ambient and roost temperatures were recorded. Activities of roosting bats were monitored using an infrared-sensitive video camera. Scan sampling was used to analyze video records taken at weekly intervals from mid-May to late July 1989. Analysis of day-roosting indicates that adult females spend an average of 77% of their time at rest, 16% alert, 7% grooming, and < 1% crawling. Bats were most active immediately following their morning return to the day-roost and just prior to their departure at dusk. Periodic bouts of activity throughout the day were usually associated with urination and (or) defecation, mother–pup interactions, and movements in response to changes in roost temperature. Females were significantly more active in mortise roosts than when roosting on the open ridgepole, probably because fluctuations in temperature in mortises were smaller. As the season progressed, the overall time that bats spent resting decreased from 86 to 70%, whereas time spent alert increased from 9 to 24%; weekly fluctuations in the incidence of grooming and crawling showed no consistent seasonal trends. Roost temperature, time of day, and date explained significant amounts of variation in both daily and seasonal activity budgets. Females rested significantly less and were more alert after young were born than before, although time spent grooming and crawling did not differ significantly between the pre- and post-partum periods. Our findings for P. subflavus generally corroborate activity budgets previously reported for the little brown bat (Myotis lucifugus).


2001 ◽  
Vol 82 (1) ◽  
pp. 173-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jody K. Sandel ◽  
Grant R. Benatar ◽  
Kyle M. Burke ◽  
Christopher W. Walker ◽  
Thomas E. Lacher, Jr. ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 420-422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy A. White ◽  
Paul R. Moosman ◽  
Charles H. Kilgore ◽  
Troy L. Best

2001 ◽  
Vol 82 (1) ◽  
pp. 173-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. K. Sandel ◽  
G. R. Benatar ◽  
K. M. Burke ◽  
C. W. Walker ◽  
T. E. Lacher ◽  
...  

1985 ◽  
Vol 63 (12) ◽  
pp. 2952-2954 ◽  
Author(s):  
Virgil Brack Jr. ◽  
John W. Twente

The durations of the periods of hibernation of the big brown bat (Eptesicus fuscus), little brown bat (Myotis lucifugus), and eastern pipistrelle (Pipistrellus subflavus) under natural conditions were determined by following intracave movements through two winter seasons in two Missouri caves. Average durations of periods of hibernation were similar for all three species (10–20 days) over a range of temperatures. Maximum durations of periods of hibernation determined were as follows: E. fuscus, 72 days; P. subflavus, 111 days (?); M. lucifugus, 83 days. Variability in the durations of the period of hibernation was much greater for P. subflavus and may be attributable to a lack of movement after arousal or the inability of the observer to discern movement between periods of hibernation. The frequency of arousal was determined to be statistically temperature dependent for M. lucifugus, but not for E. fuscus or P. subflavus, probably because of insufficient data.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document